The Chain Of Art Essays (678 words) - Art Movements, Modern Art

The Chain Of Art The Chain of Art Cubism was one of the strongest art movements in the 20th century that gave birth to many other movements such as futurism and suprematism. The Forefathers of this revolutionary way of painting were Pablo Picasso and George Braque. Although it may have seemed to be abstract and geometrical to an untrained eye, cubist art do depict real objects. The shapes are flattened onto canvas so that different sides of each shape can be shown simultaneously from many angles. This new style gave a 3 dimensional look on the canvas. The cubist movement gave rise to an extraordinary reassessment of the interaction between form and space changing the course of western art forever. The groundbreaking Demoiselles dAvignon was controversial not only for the way the women looked but also for the positions of the women. Although Picasso did not emphasize on detail, he saw that the rational, often geometric breakdown if the human head and body employed by so many African artists could provide him with the starting point for his own re-appraisal of his subjects(Cubism 53). The naked women become inextricably bound up in a flux of shapes or planes which tip backwards and forwards from the two-dimensional surface to produce much the same sensation as an elaborate sculpture(Cubism 54). Futurism was an art movement, which was influenced by cubist art. Cubism showed no motion it was futurism that was fascinated with machinery, transport and communications. In paintings and sculpture, angular forms and powerful lines were used to convey a sense of activity, this was a Futurists way of showing motion and speed. One of its innovators was Umberto Boccioni who said We want represent not the optical or analytical impression but the physical and total experience (Futurism 101). They now pinned less faith on the power of new subject matter and strove to complement their colour divisionism with fragmentation of the cubist sort (Futurism 101). Suprematism was influenced by cubism because of it geometric shapes but suprematism was not so much a movement in art as it is an attitude (Suprematism 138). This non-movement was created by Kasmir Malevichs , His elemental forms were designed both to break the artists conditioned responses to his environment and create new realities no less significant then the realities of nature herself (Suprematism 138). A suprematist work, banishes every trace of subject, it used color and form and there interaction to form a subject. While cubism had definite subject it was also the interaction of color and shape that made the subject. Constructivism was influenced by suprematism, this movement swept away traditional notions about art, believing that it should imitate the forms and processes of modern technology. Often constructivism was overtly propagandist in nature: sometimes by the placement of simple geometric forms in the kind of literary context which turns such forms into representations (Constructivism 161). De Stijl was mostly influenced by painters Piet Mondrian, Theo Van Doesburg and architect Gerrit Rietveld. These men believed that art should strive towards complete harmony, order clarity in a constant process of refinement. The works in this movement were of course geometrical, using mainly square forms. The movements forms were deeply philosophical and were rooted in the idea that art should in some way reflect order. All of these movements progressed from cubism (hence my title); they developed from shapes into other worldly meanings. They all branched out to their own ways and fell to their feelings and desirers. All of these movements developed from geometrical objects to seem as a true form such as a body or face then turn into a geometrical form. All of these innovators thought differently, they wanted to change everyone elses state of mind and with their unlikely way of thinking they have. But we have become so accustomed to it that we do not recognize it and take these powerful shapes and colors for granted. Arts Essays

Opportunity Cost in Microeconomics

Opportunity Cost in Microeconomics In economics, the opportunity cost is defined as the value of the best-foregone alternative that could have been pursued using the available resources (Pindyck Rubinfeld, 2008). The concept is used in trading activities and it incorporates two other concepts that is the comparative and absolute advantage. The below given scenario can be used to explain the concept more.Advertising We will write a custom essay sample on Opportunity Cost in Microeconomics specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More Potatoes Chickens Michelle 200 50 James 80 40 Michelle’s opportunity cost of producing potatoes From the definition of opportunity cost, Michelle’s opportunity cost of producing 200 pounds of potatoes is 50 chickens. This can be translated into, the opportunity cost of producing one potato or one unit of potatoes is four chickens or four units of chickens. Michelle’s opportunity cost of producing chickens Michelleâ€℠¢s opportunity cost of producing 50 chickens is 200 pounds of potatoes. This is the same as saying the opportunity cost of producing one chicken or one unit of chicken is 0.25 pounds of potatoes or units of potatoes. James’ opportunity cost of producing potatoes The opportunity cost of James for producing 80 units of potatoes is 40 units of chickens. This can be interpreted to say the opportunity cost of producing a single unit of potatoes is two units of chicken. James’ opportunity cost of producing chickens When James decides to devote all his resources to the production of chickens at the expense of potatoes, the opportunity cost of producing 40 units of chickens will be 80 pounds of potatoes. This means the opportunity cost of producing one unit of chicken is two units of potatoes. The person with absolute advantage Absolute advantage happens when a given country or individual specializing in the production of two commodities is more efficient in the production of both as compared to another one specializing in the production of the same (Pindyck Rubinfeld, 2008). In the above case, Michelle has an absolute advantage in the production of both potatoes and chickens since if all the resources were employed she could produce 200 pounds of potatoes as compared to James who could only produce 80 pounds of potatoes. Similarly, the same resources could yield more chickens as compared to James who could yield only 40 chickens.Advertising Looking for essay on business economics? Let's see if we can help you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More The person with comparative advantage in the production of potatoes Michelle has a comparative advantage in potatoes production because of her lower opportunity cost of production with respect to James. The person with comparative advantage in chicken production James has a comparative advantage in the production of chicken due to his lower opportunity cost of production with r espect to Micelle. The benefit of specializing in the areas in which both Michelle and James have comparative advantage Assuming the above given scenario has been given exchange rate of 2.5 pounds of potatoes for1 chicken both individuals would benefit. This is because if John produced only chickens and traded the same for potatoes, he would get 100 pounds of potatoes a little bit higher than what he would have produced if he were to devote all his resources to the production of potatoes. Similarly, if Michelle traded her 200 pounds of potatoes for chicken, she would get 80 chickens, which is more than her productive capability. Therefore, it is beneficial for both Michelle and James to specialize in potatoes and chicken production respectively and trade with each other. Importance of opportunity cost concept, absolute and comparative advantages to the nations, societies and individuals The above concepts are applicable in people’s everyday lives. This is because nations hav e varying resource endowment and their production capabilities differ from nation to nation or society to society. Therefore, each should identify the area in which it can produce goods more effectively compared to other nations and then analyzing the prevailing exchange rates, that particular nation should exchange those goods with other nations (Pindyck Rubinfeld, 2008). This will benefit all nations of the world and promote international trade. References Pindyck, R. Rubinfeld, D. (2008). Microeconomics. 7 Ed. New York, NY: Prentice Hall.Advertising We will write a custom essay sample on Opportunity Cost in Microeconomics specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More